tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7191693097594844068.post9007113518866029904..comments2024-03-02T21:22:30.865-08:00Comments on C2 ways: Paradigm Shift To Goal-OrientationSergey Seroukhovhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14436750454516362541noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7191693097594844068.post-18361548049190343512013-02-26T21:55:53.717-08:002013-02-26T21:55:53.717-08:00In my later posts I touched that topic. Process is...In my later posts I touched that topic. Process is defined as a sequence of activities. In GOMA activity is an elementary goal which is required to achieve some other higher-level goal(s). If we look at processes from that perspective we may define a process as a prescribed breakdown of goal (or set of goals) into sub-goals (activities) and setting timing dependencies (sequences) between them. Other terms that I use to call a process is "execution pattern" or "goal reaching pattern".Sergey Seroukhovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14436750454516362541noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7191693097594844068.post-32392232727312973762013-02-24T15:01:52.393-08:002013-02-24T15:01:52.393-08:00Given that the majority of things now are process ...Given that the majority of things now are process oriented, how does this framework fit into C2/GOMA or will everything have to be re done? It appears to me that C2/GOMA has no restrictions on how you achieve a goal, whether that be by a process or function. Since processes have many problems, as you stated in the blog, how do these things affect C2/GOMA if the method to achieve goals is by using processes?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com